Michelin 175/65 R14 82T Energy Saver +
Avantages et inconvénients
par nos spécialistes
Le Michelin Energy Saver+ 175/65 R14 82T est un pneu été populaire pour les petites et moyennes voitures, souvent choisi par les conducteurs qui recherchent une conduite économique et confortable. Grâce à sa faible résistance au roulement et à son mélange de gomme à base de silice, de nombreux utilisateurs constatent une baisse de la consommation de carburant et donc des coûts d’utilisation sur toute la durée de vie du pneu. Il est également reconnu pour son important kilométrage et peut parcourir de nombreux dizaines de milliers de kilomètres en usage normal, ce qui compense en partie le prix d’achat plus élevé. Sur route mouillée, il offre en général de bonnes performances, avec des distances de freinage fiables et un comportement prévisible qui rassure sous la pluie. L’Energy Saver+ est souvent décrit comme silencieux et confortable, bien adapté aux trajets quotidiens et aux longs voyages. En contrepartie, il est clairement axé sur l’efficacité et la longévité plutôt que sur une adhérence extrêmement sportive ou une direction très incisive. Pour les conducteurs qui roulent souvent de manière très dynamique, d’autres modèles peuvent convenir davantage, mais pour ceux qui privilégient surtout l’économie, la longévité et le confort, c’est un choix très solide.
Avis Michelin 175/65 R14 82T Energy Saver +
Basé sur 51 avis
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
cristian cana
22 octobre 2025
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16 avril 2021
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16 avril 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12 janvier 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12 janvier 2021