Michelin Pneus d'été Energy Saver+ 165/70R14 81T
Avantages et inconvénients
par nos spécialistes
Le Michelin Energy Saver+ 165/70 R14 81T est un pneu été économique, souvent salué pour sa faible résistance au roulement et la baisse de consommation qui en résulte. D’après plusieurs tests et avis d’utilisateurs, ce modèle surclasse de nombreux concurrents en matière d’économie de carburant et offre aussi une bonne longévité en conduite souple. Les conducteurs apprécient la tenue de route stable et le confort, surtout sur route sèche et lors des trajets autoroutiers. Les tests comparatifs indiquent toutefois que le freinage et l’adhérence en courbe sur sol mouillé restent bons, mais ne sont plus tout à fait au niveau des derniers pneus été premium de référence. Le prix d’achat est également supérieur à celui des marques bon marché, et certains usagers signalent un bruit de roulement un peu plus présent sur asphalte rugueux avec l’usure. Ce pneu convient surtout aux conducteurs calmes à moyens, qui privilégient économies de carburant et longévité plutôt qu’un grip maximal en conduite sportive sous la pluie.
Avis Michelin Pneus d'été Energy Saver+ 165/70R14 81T
Basé sur 51 avis
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
NU categoric ...clar nu as cumpara aceasta anvelopa dupa 3000 km de mers pe sosea anvelopa spate a capatat o galma ...deviatie nici nu pot descrie....repet fara sa fac offroad...nu pot sa mi explic deoarece in primi 1000 km a mers bine...dezamagit....va las un telefon 0723362588
cristian cana
22 octobre 2025
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16 avril 2021
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
MOT rejected after 7 years of use. Reason: drought cracks up to the canvas in several places. Tires still had 3.6 to 3.8 mm profile. 2 front tires, front wheel drive, 90% highway kms, all cracks on the outer rim. Bizarre.
Anonymous
16 avril 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12 janvier 2021
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
I didn't notice anything about "Energy Saving". The tire drives quite well, as you would expect from a premium manufacturer, and makes normal noises. After 20,000 km there were still 2x 6 mm / 2x 5 mm of the profile. But only a 7 mm profile was new.
Rainer Lange
12 janvier 2021
